T E S S E R A K
Post-Quantum Layer 1

Quantum-Proof
Blockchain
Infrastructure

End-to-end quantum resistance. No elliptic curves. No compromises.
Dilithium3 signatures, recursive STARKs, and lattice-based encryption.

3293
Byte Signatures
22×
Proof Compression
3–5s
Block Time
NIST
FIPS 204

The Quantum
Threat

Every major blockchain relies on elliptic curve cryptography. A quantum computer could break it all.

"Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" is not theoretical. It is an active intelligence strategy. Every transaction today is a future liability.

The Solution

5 Layers.
Zero Vulnerability.

No elliptic curve. No integer factorization. Every layer is independently quantum-resistant.

01
Signature Layer
Dilithium3 / ML-DSA — NIST FIPS 204
Module Learning With Errors (M-LWE) based. NIST Level 3 security. 3293-byte signatures, 1952-byte public keys.
02
Proof Layer
Recursive STARKs — Hash-based
1000 Dilithium3 signatures compressed into a single ~150KB proof. 22× compression. No trusted setup. Quantum-safe by construction.
03
Consensus Layer
CometBFT v0.38 — Dilithium-native fork
All validator signatures are Dilithium3. Ed25519 is entirely removed. BFT consensus, 3–5 second block times.
04
Key Management
ANS — Atomic Name Service
On-chain alias service. 1952-byte public keys mapped to short handles. Key rotation with timelock protection.
05
Anti-Spam
Lattice-PoW + Gas hybrid
Memory-hard lattice puzzle. ASIC-resistant. Dynamic equilibrium: PoW difficulty × gas price = constant. ARM NEON optimized for mobile.
Proof Compression

1000 Signatures.
1 Proof.

Recursive STARKs aggregate thousands of 3.3KB Dilithium3 signatures into a single ~150KB hash-based proof. No elliptic curves. No trusted setup.

22×
Compression Ratio
Soft Finality
1–3 sec
Dilithium3 verified
Hard Finality
15–30 sec
STARK verified
Hardware Democracy

Validator on a
Raspberry Pi

Pi-Nodes handle consensus and proof verification. Heavy computation is offloaded to the permissionless Prover Market.

Pi-Node (Validator)
~$80
Raspberry Pi 5
Sequencing · Dilithium3 verification
STARK proof verification · ANS registry
Prover (Permissionless)
GPU / FPGA
High-performance hardware
STARK proof generation
AVX-512 · ARM NEON · CUDA
3–5s
Block Time
ML-KEM-768
P2P Encryption
CosmWasm
Smart Contracts
Enterprise

Decentralize Corporate
Infrastructure

Banks and governments keep records for decades. Every ECDSA-signed archive today is quantum-readable tomorrow. TESSERAK is built for institutions that cannot afford that liability.

Long-Horizon Security
30+ year record safety — contracts, KYC, settlement archives stay sealed under Dilithium3, not exposed ECDSA
No Single Point of Failure
1000 independent validators for ~$80K in hardware hold the records — not one $1M machine in one basement
NIST Standards
FIPS 204 signatures, FIPS 203 encryption — the language auditors and regulators already speak
Auditable by Construction
Compact STARK proofs, no trusted setup — full history verifiable, no ceremony risk for regulators
$80K
1000-Validator Hardware
30+ yrs
Record Security Horizon
Zero
Trusted Setup Ceremonies
Get Started

From Risk Assessment
to Pilot

No rip-and-replace. Assess exposure, run an isolated pilot alongside existing infrastructure, then cut over in phases.

Step 01
Assess
Harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure review of records, keys, and signature dependencies across the organization.
Step 02
Pilot
Isolated validator set plus prover running alongside existing systems. Real workloads, contained blast radius.
Step 03
Cutover
Phased migration with dual-run verification, then full switch once proofs and finality meet SLA.
Start a Pilot
Comparison

Legacy vs. TESSERAK

Property Ethereum Solana TESSERAK
Quantum Resistance None None Full (end-to-end)
Signature ECDSA / secp256k1 Ed25519 Dilithium3 / ML-DSA
Proof System SNARKs (EC-based) None Recursive STARKs
Consensus Signing ECDSA / BLS Ed25519 Dilithium-native
Validator Hardware High-end server High-end server Raspberry Pi ($80)
Block Time 12 sec 0.4 sec 3–5 sec
HNDL Exposure Every tx at risk Every tx at risk Zero exposure
Anti-Spam Gas only Gas only Lattice-PoW + Gas
Security

Threat Matrix

Shor's Algorithm
Dilithium3 — M-LWE based, proven hard for classical and quantum
SNARK Vulnerability
Recursive STARKs — hash-based, no elliptic curve dependency
HNDL Attack
Quantum-resistant signatures — no retrospective key recovery possible
Spam Attacks
Lattice-PoW + Gas — dual economic barrier, ASIC-resistant
Governance Attack
Conviction Voting + Timelock — slow accumulation, no flash-loan exploits
Sybil Attack
Stake Duration Multiplier — 1×→3× over 12+ months
Token Economics

Tess-Elastic
Model

EIP-1559-style base fee burn. Dynamic fee adjustment based on block fullness. Validator 60% + Prover 40% reward split.

tess
Native denom · tess1... address prefix
Mining / Service — 40%
Ecosystem / Dev — 25%
Investor / Team — 20%
Liquidity / Airdrop — 15%
Vesting (Team/Investor)
12-month cliff · 36-month linear vesting (48 months total)
Roadmap

Development Path

Phase 0
Research & Foundation
Dilithium3 Go implementation · CometBFT fork · STARK prototype · ANS design · Lattice-PoW calibration
0–3 months
Phase 1
Devnet
Genesis chain · Dilithium3 tx signing + ANS · First STARK proof generation · Economic model simulation
3–6 months
Phase 2
Testnet
Permissionless Prover Market · Recursive STARKs · Ato DAO governance · Mobile wallet · Security audit
6–12 months
Phase 3
Mainnet
Genesis launch · Validator bootstrapping · Prover incentives · DAO activation · Third-party security audit
12+ months

Build the
Post-Quantum
Future